Legal Opinion
Addison Miller, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided April 7, 1947No. 44664PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WHITAKER, Judge.
Plaintiffs had a contract for the construction of the spillway gate structure and the cut-off structure for the Fort Peck Dam in Montana. They sue under 1 the Act of July 23, 1937, 50 Stat. 533, 28 U.S.C.A. § 250b, for excess costs alleged to have been incurred due to the causes mentioned in the Act.
The Act of July 23, 1937 gives this court jurisdiction of suits by contractors, who had contracts for the construction of locks and dams on the Mississippi River, on account of the promulgation of rules and regulations issued subsequent to the dates of the several contracts, which…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Story Parchment Co. v. Paterson Parchment Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Bigelow v. RKO Radio Pictures, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Eastman Kodak Co. v. Southern Photo Materials Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Palmer v. Connecticut Railway & Lighting Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- F. Mansfield & Sons Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1941
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Wunderlich Contracting Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1965
- Mega Construction Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1993
- Miller Elevator Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1994
- Herman Adams, Doing Business as Adams Manufacturing Company v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1966
- Shepherd v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1953
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.