Legal Opinion

Evenstad v. Buchholz

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided July 17, 1997No. Civil 960352PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VANDE WALLE, Chief Justice.

[¶ 1] Milo Buchholz appealed from a judgment permanently enjoining him from interfering with the interests of Earl and Shirley Evenstad and Darrell and Kathleen Holm in Barnes County farmland; terminating financing statements and other documents he had filed against the Evenstads’ and Holms’ real and personal property; and dismissing his counterclaim asserting a continuing right to farm the disputed property. We conclude the trial court properly denied Buchholz’s pretrial motions and did not err in ruling Buchholz had no legal or equitable interest in the property.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Matter of Adoption of JSPLNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Farm Credit Bank of St. Paul v. BrakkeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Land Office Co. v. Clapp-Thomssen Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Flex Credit, Inc. v. WinkowitschNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Lithun v. Grand Forks Public School District No. 1North Dakota Supreme Court · 1981

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Peters-Riemers v. RiemersNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Arndt v. MakiNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
  3. Mills v. City of Grand ForksNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
  4. Rath v. RathNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2018
  5. State v. HunterNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2018

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API