Legal Opinion

In re the Estate of Pelcyger

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided July 31, 1939PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Wingate, S.

Prior to its amendment by chapter 146 of the Laws of 1938, section 282 of the Surrogate’s Court Act contemplated a discretionary requirement of security for costs only from a respondent and primarily, if not exclusively, in a probate proceeding. (Matter of Meyer, 148 Misc. 901, 902.)

The 1938 amendment added the words “ Security for costs may be required from any non-resident who is a petitioner in any proceeding, provided the surrogate finds specifically that such security is necessary for the protection of the estate.”

This amendment was enacted on the suggestion of the executive…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In Re the Estate of GreenbergNew York Court of Appeals · 1933
  2. In re the Estate of GreenbergNew York Surrogate's Court · 1931
  3. In re the Estate of MeyerNew York Surrogate's Court · 1933

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re the Accounting of GreenNew York Court of Appeals · 1953
  2. Acker v. SchulteDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1947
  3. In re the Probate of the Will of KoelschNew York Surrogate's Court · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API