In re the Estate of Meyer
New York Surrogate's Court
1Opinion of the Court
Wingate, S.
The court cannot escape the impression that the effect of the present motion to compel the general guardian for the objecting parties to deposit security for costs is, in effect, a demurrer to the evidence introduced on the hearings before the referee, which hearings have not been concluded.
The application is made under section 282 of the Surrogate’s Court Act which was first enacted by chapter 443 of the Laws of 1914 as section 2750 of the Code of Civil Procedure. The wording of the enactment has been continued unchanged since its original passage, and provides: “ In any…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- In Re the Estate of GreenbergNew York Court of Appeals · 1933
- In re the Estate of GreenbergNew York Surrogate's Court · 1931
- In re the Estate of MihlmanNew York Surrogate's Court · 1931
- In re the Accounting in the Estate of StarkNew York Surrogate's Court · 1922
- In re Proving the Last Will & Testament of SchlemmerNew York Surrogate's Court · 1929
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- In re the Estate of DohertyNew York Surrogate's Court · 1935
- In re the Estate of PelcygerNew York Surrogate's Court · 1939
- In re the Probate of the Will of BrayNew York Surrogate's Court · 1941
- In re the Probate of the Will of KoelschNew York Surrogate's Court · 1943