Acker v. Schulte
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
CAFFEY, District Judge.
There are five motions by the defendants, Schulte, Park & Tilford, Inc., and Ira Haupt & Company, to require the plaintiffs to give security for costs, including reasonable attorneys’ fees, pursuant to the provisions of Section 9(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, Section 78i (e), Title 15 U.S.C.A. Schulte asks for security of $25,000 in the Acker case and $15,000 in the Schmolka case. Park & Tilford, Inc., ask for security of $25,000 in the Acker case and $10,000 in the Schmolka case. Ira Haupt & Company ask for security of $25,000 in the Acker case. They have…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co. v. WulfSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Kardon v. National Gypsum Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1946
- Grand Trunk Western Railway Co. v. LindsaySupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Park & Tilford, Inc. v. SchulteCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1947
- Baird v. FranklineCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1944
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Fischman v. Raytheon Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1951
- Nemeroff v. AbelsonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
- Speed v. Transamerica Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 1951
- Nemeroff v. AbelsonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
- Osborne v. MalloryDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1949
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.