Meyers v. Neeley & Ensor Auto Co.
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the CourtUrner, J.
The question presented on this appeal is whether ihe appellee’s common law lien for repairs to an automobile is available as against the appellant’s title reserved under a conditional sale contract, which had been duly recorded. There is an agreement as to the facts. The car which the appellee repaired had been sold by the appellant on October 30th, 1920, for $1,750, to a purchaser who made a partial payment in cash and gave Ms promissory notes for the balance, amounting to $1,658.29. Subsequent payments aggre gated $283, and the amount still due the appellant for the automobile is $1,425.29,…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Watts v. SweeneyIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
- Hammond v. DanielsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1879
- Reeves & Co. v. RussellNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1914
- J. A. Broom & Son v. S. S. Dale & SonsMississippi Supreme Court · 1915
- Meyers v. BratespieceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1896
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Patapsco Trailer Service & Sales, Inc. v. Eastern Freightways, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1974
- Finance & Guaranty Co. v. Defiance Motor Truck Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1924
- Universal Credit Co. v. MarksCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1933
- General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. SutherlandNebraska Supreme Court · 1932
- In re ShipleyDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1928
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.