Legal Opinion
Universal Credit Co. v. Marks
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Decided January 19, 1933No. [No. 93, October Term, 1932.]PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtParke, J.
The Universal 'Credit Company began an action of replevin against Morris Marks and Morris Kronberg, copartners trading as Eallsway Auto Radiator, Pender & Body Works, and William McDaniel, in the Baltimore City Court, to recover possession of an automobile alleged to be seized and taken and unjustly detained by the defendants. The chattel was replevied and delivered to the plaintiff, and the two copartners were summoned, but McDaniel was not summoned, and the action proceeded against the copartners, who pleaded non cepit, and property in the partnership. After replication by a joinder of…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Houston v. MooreSupreme Court of the United States · 1820
- Morley v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Brinckerhoff v. . BostwickNew York Court of Appeals · 1885
- Harrison v. SterrySupreme Court of the United States · 1809
- Bradshaw v. LankfordCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1891
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Kelley Kar Co. v. FinklerOhio Supreme Court · 1951
- Bethlehem Steel Corp. v. G.C. Zarnas & Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1985
- Thomas G. Jewett, Jr. Inc. v. Keystone Driller Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1933
- Snider Bros., Inc. v. HeftCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1974
- Hansen v. KuhnSupreme Court of Iowa · 1939
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.