Legal Opinion

Williamson v. Eclipse Motor Lines, Inc.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided July 25, 1945No. 30232PublishedCited by 51 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMatthias, J.

The claim of the plaintiff against the defendant is based entirely upon the charge of negligence of the latter in placing its motor vehicle in the care, custody and control of an incompetent driver whose negligent operation of such vehicle on a public highway in this state caused damage to the plaintiff’s automobile.

The relationship of employer and employee is therefore not necessarily involved, for the action does not rest upon- the doctrine of respondeat superior. Such relationship may in some cases have a bearing upon the issue of permission to operate a motor vehicle. The basis of the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Gordon v. BedardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929
  2. Elliott v. HardinsOhio Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Wery v. SeffOhio Supreme Court · 1940
  4. Fisher v. FletcherIndiana Supreme Court · 1922
  5. Guedon v. RooneyOregon Supreme Court · 1938

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by51 opinions

  1. Casebolt ex rel. Casebolt v. CowanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1992
  2. Snowhite v. State, Use of TennantCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1966
  3. Abraham v. S. E. Onorato GaragesHawaii Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Gulla v. StrausOhio Supreme Court · 1950
  5. Payne v. KinderWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1962

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API