Legal Opinion
Berryman v. Hofbauer
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided May 1, 1995No. Civ. A. No. 90-CV-40207-FLPublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
NEWBLATT, Senior District Judge.
Before the Court is defendants’ motion for taxation of costs (D.E.# 79) and plaintiffs response. In their motion, defendants seek to tax costs pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(d) and 28 U.S.C. §§ 1920 and 1923(a). In his response, plaintiff opposes defendants’ motion for several reasons. Defendants have not filed a reply. The Court will address these issues seriatim.
I. Timeliness of Motion to Tax Costs
First, plaintiff maintains that defendants’ motion should be denied as untimely. Plaintiff relies upon 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d)(1)(B), which…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Sales v. MarshallCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1989
- Ronald Weaver Leo McKaye Morris Martin v. Raymond Toombs Robert Brown, Jr. Donald Mason Robert Mulvaney Ted StrassburgCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1991
- Holmes v. Cessna Aircraft Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
- Commercial Credit Equipment Corporation, a Delaware Corporation v. Marion J. StampsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
- U.S. Industries, Inc. v. Touche Ross & Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- In Re: San Juan v. MassaroCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1997
- Johnson v. MorthamDistrict Court, N.D. Florida · 1997
- Hall v. Ohio Education Ass'nDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1997
- Bell v. Prefix, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2011
- Consumer Fin. Prot. Bureau v. Weltman, Weinberg & Reis, Co., L.P.A.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2018
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.