Legal Opinion
Holmes v. Cessna Aircraft Co.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided January 10, 1994No. 93-01551PublishedCited by 65 opinions
1Per curiam
By order signed May 11, 1993, the district court below granted Defendant/Appellee Cessna Aircraft Company’s motion to tax costs under 28 ti.S.C. § 1920 against Plaintiff/Appellant Rita Holmes. Holmes filed this appeal challenging certain elements of the court’s cost award. We review the district court’s order for an abuse of discretion. United States v. Kolesar, 313 F.2d 835, 840 (5th Cir.1963).
I. Expert Witness Fees
The district court allowed Cessna to recoup the sum of $4,863.00 for the time its experts Eggspuehler and Marwill attended trial. Holmes submits, and Cessna agrees, that this…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- United States v. Marrian Kolesar and Andrew Kolesar, Her HusbandCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1963
- Studiengesellschaft Kohle Mbh, as Trustee for the Max-Planck-Institut Fur Kohlenforschung v. Eastman Kodak CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1983
- National Bancard Corp. v. Visa, U.S.A., Inc.District Court, S.D. Florida · 1986
3Cited by65 opinions
- Carol Majeske v. City of ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
- Simi Investment Company Inc v. Harris County TexasCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2000
- Embotelladora Agral Regiomontana S.A. De C v. v. Sharp Capital, Inc.District Court, N.D. Texas · 1997
- Berryman v. HofbauerDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1995
- Honestech, Inc. v. Sonic SolutionsDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 2010
60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.