Legal Opinion

Edward Andrew Stumm v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)

Decided August 29, 2005No. 02-04-00493-CRPublished

1Opinion of the Court

COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 2-04-493-CR

EDWARD ANDREW STUMM APPELLANT

V

THE STATE OF TEXAS STATE

------------

FROM THE 355TH DISTRICT COURT OF HOOD COUNTY

------------

MEMORANDUM OPINION1

------------

In two points, appellant Edward Andrew Stumm challenges the trial court’s denial of his postconviction motion for DNA testing. We affirm.

Appellant’s motion requested DNA testing of “biological material . . . that was secured in relation to the offense of the challenged convictions and sentences” that appellant contended was in the State’s possession. Appellant did not identify…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Guzman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
  2. Rivera v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2002
  3. Skinner v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2003
  4. Lopez v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2003
  5. Robert Lee Bolden v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API