Legal Opinion

Robert Lee Bolden v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)

Decided July 31, 2003No. 02-03-00035-CRPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SUE WALKER, Justice.

I. Introduction

In a single point, Bolden challenges the trial court’s denial of his motion for forensic DNA testing pursuant to article 64 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure. Tex.Code Crim. PROC. Ann. art. 64.01 (Vernon Supp.2003). We will affirm.

II. Background Facts

Bolden was convicted by a jury of aggravated robbery with a deadly weapon in May 2000. In June 2002, Bolden filed a motion pursuant to article 64.01 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure seeking DNA testing of evidence containing biological material. See id. The trial court appointed counsel to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Rivera v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2002
  2. Kutzner v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2002
  3. Dinkins v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2002
  4. Shannon v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2003

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Ben Daniel Williams v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2016
  2. Edward Andrew Stumm v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2005
  3. Edward Andrew Stumm v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2005
  4. James Paul White v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2006
  5. James Paul White v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2006

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API