Legal Opinion
Heinemann v. Howe & Rusling
District Court, W.D. New York
Decided April 29, 2003No. 02-CV-6211LPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER
LARIMER, District Judge.
INTRODUCTION
Plaintiff, Marion Heinemann, commenced this action on April 12, 2002, alleging claims under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq.; the Equal Pay Act, 29 U.S.C. § 206(d); the Americans with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq.; the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (“ADEA”), 29 U.S.C. § 621 et seq.; and the New York Human Rights Law (“HRL”), N.Y. Exec. L. § 296 et seq. Plaintiff filed an amended complaint on July 23, 2002, adding a claim under Chapter 63 of the Rochester, New York Municipal Code. 1
Pla…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Burlington Industries, Inc. v. EllerthSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Carole Tomka v. The Seiler Corporation, Daniel Lucey, David Polonsky and Timothy ConroyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
- Louis Carter v. Dutchess Community CollegeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
- Patrowich v. Chemical BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
- Murphy v. ERA United RealtyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Feingold v. New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004
- Feingold v. New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004
- King v. Town of WallkillDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2004
- Picinich v. United Parcel ServiceDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2004
- Wadler v. Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2015