Legal Opinion

Murphy v. ERA United Realty

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 15, 1998PublishedCited by 62 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for discrimination based on sex and national origin pursuant to the New York State Human Rights Law (Executive Law art 15), the defendants ERA United Realty, Petee Realty, Peter Orisses, and Nick Kavourgias appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Posner, J.), dated January 29, 1997, as denied their motion for partial summary judgment dismissing the plaintiff’s first, second, third, and fifth causes of action.

Ordered that the order is modified, on the law, by deleting *470the provision thereof…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Carole Tomka v. The Seiler Corporation, Daniel Lucey, David Polonsky and Timothy ConroyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
  2. Patrowich v. Chemical BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
  3. In re 12 Cornelia Street, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1982
  4. Matter of Sullivan Co., Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1942
  5. Wanamaker v. Columbian Rope Co.District Court, N.D. New York · 1990

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by62 opinions

  1. Patane v. ClarkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007
  2. Feingold v. New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004
  3. Feingold v. New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004
  4. Hart v. Rick's Cabaret International Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2013
  5. Malena v. Victoria's Secret Direct, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2012

57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API