Legal Opinion

Crawford v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided March 22, 1899No. 1879PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Ho statement necessary.

1Opinion of the Court

HENDERSON, Judge.

Appellant was convicted of passing, as true, a forged instrument, and his punishment assessed at confinement in the penitentiary for a term of two years, and he appeals.

The indictment charged Jasper Crawford with passing, as true, the following forged instrument in writing, purporting to be the act of an other, to wit, the act of E. P. Fraser, which said false instrument is to the tenor following: “March the 31st, ’98. Mr. W. P. Williams and Brother—Sir: You will please let Jasper Craford hav too par of shoes, one pond of to Baker. [Signed] E. P. Fraser.” Motion in arrest of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Womble v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1898

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Watson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1917
  2. Keagan v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1981
  3. Forcy, Alias Jones v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1910
  4. Lynch v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1899
  5. Black v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1901

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API