Legal Opinion

Henrich v. McCauley

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided January 25, 1923No. 3252PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hines, J:

(After stating the foregoing facts.)

The propounder complains of the charge on the subject of impeachment of witnesses, which is contained in the first ground of the amendment to her motion for new trial, and is set out in full in the statement of facts. On the subject of the impeachment of witnesses, the court instructed the jury as follows: “If you find that any witness has been impeached by proof of contradictory statements, you should disregard that statement which is in conflict with the statement previously made, unless corroborated by other credible testimony, and the credit to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Waycaster v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1911
  2. Purvis v. Atlanta Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1911
  3. Davis v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1876
  4. Georgia Railway & Electric Co. v. CockeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1912

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Darden v. Mayor of WashingtonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1926
  2. King v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1926
  3. Gilbert v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API