Darden v. Mayor of Washington
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtStephens, J.
1. While, as against one who maintains a system of electrically charged wires, the inference of negligence in the maintenance of the wires is authorized by the fact that one of the wires, charged with electricity, is found hanging loose in a dangerous situation, this inference is not demanded as a matter of law, but it is an inference of fact only which the jury is authorized, but is not legally obligated, to draw. Chenall v. Palmer Brick Co., 117 Ga. 106, 108 (43 S. E. 443); Palmer Brick Co. v. Chenall, 119 Ga. 837 (47 S. E. 329) ; Augusta Railway & Electric Co. v. Weekly, 124 Ga. 384 (52 S.…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Chenall v. Palmer Brick Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1903
- Palmer Brick Co. v. ChenallSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
- Augusta Railway & Electric Co. v. WeeklySupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
- Western & Atlantic Railroad v. BusseySupreme Court of Georgia · 1894
- Denson v. Georgia Railway & Electric Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1910
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Crosby v. Savannah Electric & Power Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1966
- Pembrook Management, Inc. v. CossaboonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1981
- Candler v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1935
- McRae v. WilbyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1939
- Allen Williams B/n/f Louise J. Smyre v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1965
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.