Legal Opinion

United States v. Fagg

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided March 24, 1992No. 67,216; ACM 29129PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court

COX, Judge:

This case is a companion to United States v. Henderson, 34 MJ 174 (CMA 1992), also decided this day. As in Henderson, the issues before us concern the constitutionality of Article 125(a), Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC § 925(a), which proscribes “sodomy,” statutorily defined as “unnatural carnal copulation with another person of the same or opposite sex or with an animal.” For the reasons stated in Henderson, we uphold the constitutionality of Article 125(a).

The accused was convicted, in accordance with his pleas, of one specification of consensual…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bowers v. HardwickSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. United States v. HendersonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1992
  3. United States v. FaggU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1991

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. United States v. StocksUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1992
  2. United States v. PedrazoliUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 1997
  3. United States v. GatesUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1994
  4. United States v. NixU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1992
  5. United States v. ReisterU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1994

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API