Legal Opinion

Ford Motor Co. v. National Indemnify Co.

District Court, E.D. Virginia

Decided September 6, 2013No. Civil Action No. 3:12cv839PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

ROBERT E. PAYNE, Senior District Judge.

This matter is before the Court on DEFENDANT NATIONAL INDEMNITY COMPANY’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (Docket No. 181), pursuant to Fed.R.CivJP. 56, and DEFENDANT NATIONAL INDEMNITY COMPANY’S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE AN AMENDED ANSWER AND AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES (Docket No. 165). As part of its Motion for Summary Judgment, National Indemnity Company (“NICO”) argues that the so-called “Noerr-Pennington ” doctrine immunizes it from any liability it may otherwise have for causing the filing of an arbitration agreement. NICO’s Motion for Leave…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
  4. First Nat. Bank of Ariz. v. Cities Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
  5. Eastern Railroad Presidents Conference v. Noerr Motor Freight, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Navient Solutions, LLC v. Jeffrey LohmanCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2025
  2. Navient Solutions, LLC v. Jeffrey LohmanCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2025
  3. The Garmon Corporation v. Vetnique Labs, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API