Legal Opinion

Maples v. State

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided April 24, 1978PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HARBISON, Justice.

Petitioner was fined for contempt as the result of admittedly fraudulent divorce proceedings which he instituted in a chancery court and in which he gave false testimony. Subsequently he was convicted of the statutory offense of perjury for that false testimony. His principal insistence on appeal is that the criminal prosecution was barred on principles of double jeopardy. The Court of Criminal Appeals affirmed the conviction. We granted certiorari to give further consideration to that question and also to the manner in which petitioner’s petition for probation was…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. Ex Parte HudgingsSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
  3. In Re MichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  4. State v. BlackTennessee Supreme Court · 1975
  5. United States v. Patricia Ann Essex, Also Known as Patricia Ann ClarkCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1969

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. ThompsonOregon Supreme Court · 1983
  2. State v. SammonsCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1982
  3. Baggett v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1985
  4. Moody v. HutchisonCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2004
  5. State v. WinninghamTennessee Supreme Court · 1997

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API