Legal Opinion

State v. Winningham

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided December 29, 1997No. 01S01-9701-CC-00008PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BIRCH, Justice.

Billy O. Winningham, the appellee, was adjudicated in contempt of court for having violated an order of protection issued at the request of his estranged wife. The contemptuous conduct alleged included setting the fire that burned down his wife’s house. 1 This same conduct also served as the basis for an arson indictment later returned against him.

The trial court, upon the appellee’s motion, dismissed the indictment on double jeopardy grounds; the Court of Criminal Appeals affirmed that judgment. We granted the State’s application for review under Rule 11, Tenn. R.App.…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. United States v. DixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. Grady v. CorbinSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  5. Duchac v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1973

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. State v. WatkinsTennessee Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Wilson v. WilsonTennessee Supreme Court · 1998
  3. State v. KingTennessee Supreme Court · 1998
  4. State v. HayesCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1999
  5. OUTDOOR MANAGEMENT, LLC v. ThomasCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2007

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API