Legal Opinion
Kimberly Carlson and Patrick Stansberry v. CoBank
District Court, D. Colorado
Decided November 7, 2025No. 1:23-cv-02402Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO District Judge S. Kato Crews Civil Action No. 1:23-cv-02402-SKC-TPO KIMBERLY CARLSON, and PATRICK STANSBERRY, Plaintiffs, v. COBANK, Defendant. ORDER RE: MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DKT. 42) This case arises from Defendant CoBank’s decision to terminate Plaintiffs Kimberly Carlson’s and Patrick Stansberry’s employment. Dkt. 1. Plaintiffs assert claims pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Colorado Anti- Discrimination Act and contend CoBank discriminated against them based on their religious beliefs. Id.…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Scott v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Bones v. Honeywell International, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2004
- David L. White v. York International CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
- Mitchell v. City of MooreCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.