Legal Opinion

Embry v. O'BANNON

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided October 29, 2003No. 49S02-0310-CV-479PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DICKSON, Justice.

This is an appeal from a summary judgment denying relief in an action brought by four Indiana taxpayers against Governor Frank O'Bannon and Superintendent of Public Instruction Suellen Reed, head of the Indiana Department of Education (collectively termed "the State"). The taxpayers' lawsuit challenges the "dual-enrollment" process whereby the State provides public funds "which are used to pay teachers who teach classes in parochial schools and which are used to provide such things as internet services to parochial schools." Br. of Appellants at 10. The taxpayers contend that…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Freidline v. Shelby Insurance Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Pence v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Higgins v. HaleIndiana Supreme Court · 1985
  4. State Ex Rel. Cittadine v. Indiana Department of TransportationIndiana Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Schloss v. City of IndianapolisIndiana Supreme Court · 1990

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Huffman v. Indiana Office of Environmental AdjudicationIndiana Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Meredith v. PenceIndiana Supreme Court · 2013
  3. Wilcox Manufacturing Group, Inc. v. Marketing Services of Indiana, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2005
  4. American United Life Insurance Co. v. DouglasIndiana Court of Appeals · 2004
  5. John Kluge v. Brownsburg Community School CoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2023

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API