Legal Opinion

Lemp v. Randall

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided June 1, 1909No. 558PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Hearing on an appeal from a decision of the Commissioner of Patents in an interference case. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Robb

This is an appeal from three concurring decisions of the Patent Office tribunals in an interference case in which priority. of invention has been awarded Arthur F. Randall and Edmund A. Bates, appellees here, as joint inventors.

In their preliminary statement, Randall and Bates named July, 1899, as their date of conception, August, 1899, as their date of disclosure, and July, 1899, as the time when they first made drawings of their invention. They rely upon their filing date, February 3, 1900, for constructive reduction to practice.

Hermann Lemp, in his preliminary statement, alleges conception…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Monsanto Company v. KampDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1967
  2. Duffy v. TegtmeyerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1974
  3. Linkow v. LinkowCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1975
  4. Manny v. GarlickCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1943
  5. Brown v. EdelerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1940

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API