Legal Opinion

Manny v. Garlick

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided April 5, 1943No. Patent Appeal 4711PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LENROOT, Associate Judge.

This is an appeal from a decision of the "Board of Interference Examiners of the "United States Patent Office, which awarded •priority of invention of the subject matter ■of all the counts in issue to Mark J. Gar-lick, one of the joint applicants in the application of the party Garlick, Lee and Barney.

The interference arose between a patent issued to appellant on July 25, 1939, upon an application filed July 14, 1938, and the joint application of the party Garlick et al. filed July 11, 1938.

Appellant being the junior party the ¡burden was upon him to establish…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In re RobertsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1920
  2. Briggs v. KaislingCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1923
  3. Crane v. GrierCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1934
  4. Lemp v. RandallCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1909

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Teter v. KearbyCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1948
  2. Duffy v. TegtmeyerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1974
  3. Anderson v. AndersonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1975
  4. Application of StrainCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1951
  5. Becton-Dickinson & Co. v. Robert P. Scherer Corp.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1952

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API