Legal Opinion

United States v. Edmiston

District Court, D. Nebraska

Decided January 28, 1954No. Cr. 82-52PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DONOHOE, Chief Judge.

Defendant, Willard L. Edmiston, was indicted by a Federal Grand Jury in this district for violation of the Universal Military Training and Service Act, 50 U.S.C.A.Appendix, § 462. At the request of defendant, who was without funds, the court appointed counsel to represent him. See Rule 44, Fed.Rules Crim.Proc., 18 U.S.C.A. Upon careful consideration of the admissible evidence produced at defendant’s trial, the court makes the general finding that the defendant is not guilty. Since neither party has requested special findings, this general finding will suffice to dispose…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Dickinson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  2. United States v. NugentSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  3. Dickinson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1953
  4. United States v. EvansDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1953
  5. United States v. StasevicDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1953

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Clifton Charles Campbell v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1955
  2. United States v. SimmonsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1954
  3. Bond v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1967
  4. United States v. PhillipsDistrict Court, N.D. West Virginia · 1956
  5. Clifton Charles Campbell v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1955

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API