Legal Opinion

Kraiterman v. City of Boston

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided May 24, 1939PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDonahue, J.

The plaintiff’s intestate brought this action in a district court to recover damages for injuries received by him when struck by an automobile owned by the defendant. He has since died, but for convenience the word “plaintiff” is hereinafter used in referring either to him or to his administratrix.(1) There were two trials in the District Court and two reports to the Appellate Division. At the first trial the defendant waived any question of agency and admitted that the automobile was owned by the defendant and was being operated by one Doherty on the business of the defendant at the time of…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Bolster v. City of LawrenceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1917
  2. Sloper v. City of QuincyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938
  3. Cheney v. Boston & Maine RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1923
  4. Orlando v. City of BrocktonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1936
  5. Lynch v. City of SpringfieldMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1899

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Whalen v. Worcester Electric Light Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
  2. Keeney v. CiborowskiMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
  3. Via v. Asbestos Textile Co. Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1957
  4. Neustadt v. GennellyMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1983
  5. Conti v. City of SomervilleMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API