Harrell v. Minnesota Mutual Life Insurance Co.
Tennessee Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ANDERSON, Justice.
We granted this appeal to determine whether we should retain “the Distretti Rule 1 ” adopted by this Court sixty-seven years ago. The rule provides that before a death will be considered accidental under the terms of an insurance contract, the means, as well as the result, must be involuntary, unexpected, and unusual.
In this case, the Chancellor held that the plaintiffs death in an automobile collision was caused by her driving under the influence of an intoxicant, and it therefore was not “death by an accidental injury which was unintended, unexpected, and…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Mary Jane Wickman v. Northwestern National Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
- Landress v. Phoenix Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Republic National Life Insurance Co. v. HeywardTexas Supreme Court · 1976
- Tata v. NicholsTennessee Supreme Court · 1993
- Carnes v. CarnesKentucky Supreme Court · 1986
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by53 opinions
- Standard Fire Insurance Co. v. Chester-O'Donley & Associates, Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1998
- USA Life One Insurance v. NuckollsIndiana Supreme Court · 1997
- Alcazar v. HayesTennessee Supreme Court · 1998
- Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance Co. v. JeffersonCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2002
- Cranfill v. Aetna Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2002
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.