Legal Opinion

Vail v. Rinehart

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided January 19, 1886No. 11,642PublishedCited by 17 opinions

From the Pulaski Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Howk, J. —

On the 29th day of June, 1883, appellee, Rinehart, as sole plaintiff, commenced this action against the appellants, Benjamin F. Vail, executor of the last will of Sarah A. Vail, deceased, Kate H. Root and Deloss Root, James N. Huston, administrator of the estate of William Huston, deceased, and surviving partner of the firm of James N. & Wm. Huston, William B. Shepherd and Hugh Dickey, as defendants.

In his complaint the appellee alleged that on the 9th day of February, 1874, Nathan S. and David H. Hazen purchased at public auction from the treasurer of Pulaski county, at the annual…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Fischli v. FischliIndiana Supreme Court · 1825
  2. Richardson v. JonesIndiana Supreme Court · 1877
  3. Anderson v. AckermanIndiana Supreme Court · 1883
  4. Elwood v. BeymerIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  5. Gale v. ParksIndiana Supreme Court · 1877

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Daniels v. BruceIndiana Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Maynard v. WaidlichIndiana Supreme Court · 1901
  3. St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. BrunerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  4. State ex rel. Ruhlman v. RuhlmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  5. Wilson v. BuellIndiana Supreme Court · 1889

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API