Legal Opinion
United States ex rel. Pippin v. J.R. Youngdale Construction Co.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided January 11, 1991No. Nos. 88-6724, 89-55038PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DAVID R. THOMPSON, Circuit Judge:
Norman Pippin (“Pippin”) brought a single action under the Miller Act, 40 U.S.C. §§ 270a-d, against J.R. Youngdale Construction Company (“Youngdale”), Lumbermen’s Mutual Casualty Company (“Lumbermen”), and Sheridan Bishop (“Bishop”). After a one-day bench trial, the district court determined that Pippin’s claim was not barred by the one-year statute of limitations of section 270b(b) of the Miller Act and granted judgment in favor of Pippin and against Lumbermen and Bishop. Both Lumbermen and Bishop appeal the district court’s judgment. We have jurisdiction…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Griggs v. Provident Consumer Discount Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Browder v. Director, Dept. of Corrections of Ill.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Shirley Marrical v. The Detroit News, Inc., Robert SageCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1986
- Interform Co. v. MitchellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
- United States ex rel. John D. Ahern Co. v. J. F. White Contracting Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1981
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- United States ex rel. Air Control Technologies, Inc. v. Pre Con Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- United States for the Use of Pippin, Norman, Dba: Pippin Grading & Paving v. J.R. Youngdale Construction Company, Inc., and Bishop Sheridan, Iii, Dba: Bishop III Demolition, United States for the Use of Pippin, Norman, Dba: Pippin Grading & Paving v. J.R. Youngdale Construction Company, Inc. Bishop Sheridan, Iii, Dba: Bishop III Demolition, and Lumbermen's Mutual CasualtyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991