Legal Opinion

United States ex rel. Air Control Technologies, Inc. v. Pre Con Industries, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided June 28, 2013No. 11-56230PublishedCited by 100 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MURGUIA, Circuit Judge:

The Miller Act requires that a general contractor on a federal construction project furnish a payment bond “for the protection of all persons supplying labor and material” on the project. 40 U.S.C. *1175§ 3131(b)(2). Any person who has supplied labor or material on the project may bring a civil action on the payment bond against the general contractor, see 40 U.S.C. § 3133(b)(1), but the action “must be brought no later than one year after the day on which the last of the labor was performed or material was supplied by the person bringing the action,” 40 U.S.C. §…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Arbaugh v. Y & H Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2006
  2. Holland v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  3. Bowles v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. Safe Air for Everyone v. MeyerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
  5. Miller v. GammieCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by100 opinions

  1. Esteban Aleman Gonzalez v. William BarrCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
  2. Ayala v. Frito Lay, Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 2017
  3. Langan v. United Services Automobile Ass'nDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2014
  4. Adriana Holt v. County of OrangeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2024
  5. Minor v. Fedex Office & Print Services, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2016

95 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API