Legal Opinion

Ray Malooly Trust v. Juhl

Texas Supreme Court

Decided February 24, 2006No. 04-0685PublishedCited by 61 opinions

1Per curiam

The trial court entered and the court of appeals affirmed a judgment for $351,352 against “The Ray Malooly Trust.” The latter appeals, pointing out that a trust is not a legal entity. While the point is well-taken, we deny the petition for review as it was waived.

The Juhls sued the Trust in May 1999, alleging a breach of lease. More than three years later, on the day trial began, the Trust filed a verified answer stating for the first time that “Defendant, The Ray Malooly Trust does not have capacity to be sued.” The trial court denied leave to file the amended pleading on grounds of…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. City of San Antonio v. City of BoerneTexas Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Austin Nursing Center, Inc. v. LovatoTexas Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Ltd. v. Williamson County Appraisal DistrictTexas Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Huie v. DeShazoTexas Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Werner v. ColwellTexas Supreme Court · 1995

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by61 opinions

  1. Tooke v. City of MexiaTexas Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Jay Isaac Hollis v. Loretta LynchCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2016
  3. Bradley v. Ingalls (In Re Bradley)Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2007
  4. Michael D. Lee v. the Rogers Agency, C. Michael Rogers, and New York Life Insurance Company, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2016
  5. In Re Estate of Bean, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2006

56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API