Bradley v. Ingalls (In Re Bradley)
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
DENNIS, Circuit Judge:
Our main concern in this bankruptcy appeal is whether the burdens and ele ments of proof were correctly applied in a bankruptcy trustee’s action to trace and recover assets that a debtor “self-settled” into a spendthrift trust of which he is the beneficiary. The bankruptcy and district courts held that, although the debtor and his business associates used the trust in a scheme to defraud his creditors, the trust could not be declared a sham because under Texas law the doctrine of sham or illusory trust applies only in marital litigation. Instead, those courts held that…
2Cases cited45 opinions
- Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Smith v. EMC CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2004
- Huie v. DeShazoTexas Supreme Court · 1996
- Matter of Haber Oil Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
- Omohundro v. MatthewsTexas Supreme Court · 1960
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Ingalls v. Thompson (In Re Bradley)Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2009
- Rapid Settlements Ltd v. Scott ShcolnikCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2012
- ASARCO, L.L.C. v. Elliott ManagementCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2011
- Dewitt v. StewartCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2020
- In Re SmithUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Texas · 2009
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.