Legal Opinion

Bradley v. Ingalls (In Re Bradley)

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided September 20, 2007No. 05-51626, 06-50808PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DENNIS, Circuit Judge:

Our main concern in this bankruptcy appeal is whether the burdens and ele ments of proof were correctly applied in a bankruptcy trustee’s action to trace and recover assets that a debtor “self-settled” into a spendthrift trust of which he is the beneficiary. The bankruptcy and district courts held that, although the debtor and his business associates used the trust in a scheme to defraud his creditors, the trust could not be declared a sham because under Texas law the doctrine of sham or illusory trust applies only in marital litigation. Instead, those courts held that…

2Cases cited45 opinions

  1. Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Smith v. EMC CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2004
  3. Huie v. DeShazoTexas Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Matter of Haber Oil Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
  5. Omohundro v. MatthewsTexas Supreme Court · 1960

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Ingalls v. Thompson (In Re Bradley)Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2009
  2. Rapid Settlements Ltd v. Scott ShcolnikCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2012
  3. ASARCO, L.L.C. v. Elliott ManagementCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2011
  4. Dewitt v. StewartCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2020
  5. In Re SmithUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Texas · 2009

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API