Legal Opinion
People v. Fratta
New York Court of Appeals
Decided February 10, 1994PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.
Defendant alleges that, relying on the court reporter’s certification that the transcript of each day’s proceedings was a complete record of the machine shorthand notes, appellate counsel neglected to include in the filed brief a Batson issue that had been preserved in the voir dire minutes (see, Batson v Kentucky, 476 US 79). Apparently, as a matter of practice, voir dire minutes were not included as part of trial transcripts. Just after this Court’s decision in People v Antommarchi (80 NY2d 247), appellate…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- People v. AntommarchiNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
- People v. MitchellNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
3Cited by29 opinions
- People v. CosbyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- Grady v. ArtuzDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1996
- People v. Marquis A.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
- People v. MorganAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
- People v. FrancoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.