Legal Opinion
Grady v. Artuz
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided June 24, 1996No. 94 Civ. 7362 (JGK)PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
KOELTL, District Judge:
Reverend Nathaniel T. Grady petitions for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 based on an alleged violation of his Sixth Amendment right to the effective assistance of appellate counsel. The petitioner argues that his counsel's failure to raise on direct appeal the claim that the indictment was duplicitous constituted unconstitutionally ineffective assistance of counsel. A count of an indictment is duplicitous under New York law if it charges more than one offense.
I
The relevant factual circumstances relating to Grady’s prosecution based…
2Cases cited76 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Coleman v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Schlup v. DeloSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Jones v. BarnesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Wainwright v. SykesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
71 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Richard Gerry Drinkard v. Gary L. Johnson, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional DivisionCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996
- Ronald Mason v. Craig A. HanksCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
- Ward v. WolfenbargerDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2004
- Rafael Flores v. Joseph Demskie, Superintendent of Woodbourne Correctional FacilityCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
- Sparman v. EdwardsDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1997
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.