Legal Opinion

Dietzel v. Martin

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided May 3, 1933No. 2358PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

O’QUINN, Justice.

On December 6, 1926, appellant executed and delivered to Wimer-Richardson & Co., an investment corporation, four notes for a total of $10,000, payable to bearer or order, bearing 7 per cent, interest and providing for attorney’s fees. They were numbered 1 to 4, and payable at the office of Wimer-Riehard-son & Co. in San Antonio, Tex., “on or before” one, two, three, and four years from date, respectively. Appellant also executed and delivered to Wimer-Richardson & Co. certain interest coupon notes, payable to bearer or order, at the office of Wimer-Richardson & Co., and to…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Cunningham v. McDonaldTexas Supreme Court · 1904
  2. First Nat. Bank of Aubrey v. ChapmanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1914
  3. Higley v. DennisCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1905
  4. Hassard v. MayCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1912
  5. Boltz v. GrafCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1931

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Dietzel v. MartinTexas Commission of Appeals · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API