Legal Opinion

Dietzel v. Martin

Texas Commission of Appeals

Decided February 7, 1934No. 1739—6594PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HARVEY, Presiding Judge.

This suit was brought by the plaintiff in error, A. L. Dietzel, against Mrs. Virginia Martin, the defendant in error, seeking' cancellation of certain promissory notes hereinafter described, on the alleged ground that said notes have been paid. Mrs. Martin, by cross-action, sought recovery on the notes, but did not seek foreclosure of the deed of trust lien hereinafter mentioned. The case was tried to the court, without a jury, resulting in a judgment for Mrs. Martin for the amount of the notes. The Court of Civil Appeals affirmed that judgment. 59 S.W.(2d) 863.

The…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Dietzel v. MartinCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1933

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Barthel v. Sovereign Camp, Woodmen of the WorldMissouri Court of Appeals · 1936
  2. Boltz v. GrafTexas Commission of Appeals · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API