Cunningham v. McDonald
Texas Supreme Court
Error to the Court of Civil Appeals for the Third District. McDonald sued Cunningham and had judgment. Defendant appealed, and on affirmance obtained-writ of error.
1Opinion of the Court
BROWN, Associate Justice.
The honorable Court of Civil Appeals failed to make such statement of this case as would enable this court to pass upon the question presented, therefore we must look to the statément of facts for the undisputed testimony, from which we make the following statement:
On the 1st day of November, 1898, J. E. McDonald and his wife, Thula McDonald, citizens of Limestone County, Texas, borrowed $735 from the Bunnell & Eno Investment Company, a corporation doing business in the city of Philadelphia, State of Pennsylvania, giving their note for the amount, payable at the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Mattison v. MarksMichigan Supreme Court · 1875
- Buchanan v. WrenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1895
- Walsh v. PetersonNebraska Supreme Court · 1900
3Cited by16 opinions
- Chase v. Commerce Trust Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
- Southland Life Ins. Co. v. HopkinsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1920
- Navajo County Bank v. DolsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
- Smith v. JarmanUtah Supreme Court · 1922
- Boltz v. GrafCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1931
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.