Legal Opinion

McQuillen v. City of Sioux City

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided June 17, 1981No. 65602PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McCORMICK, Justice.

The question here is whether the trial court abused its discretion in dismissing plaintiff’s petition because of his refusal to undergo a medical examination ordered by the court pursuant to Iowa R.Civ.P. 132. We find no abuse of discretion and therefore affirm the judgment.

Plaintiff Mervin E. McQuillen is a Sioux City policeman. He was off work and received medical care at the expense of defendant Sioux City because of frequent chest pains which he and his personal physician attributed to variant angina. At the request of the City, plaintiff was examined by physicians at…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Schlagenhauf v. HolderSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  2. General Dynamics Corp. v. Selb Manufacturing Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1973
  3. Smiley v. Twin City Beef Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1975
  4. Postell v. Amana Refrigeration, Inc.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 1980
  5. Clark v. SherriffSupreme Court of Iowa · 1956

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Suckow v. Boone State Bank & Trust, Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1982
  2. Leonard Jack v. P and A Farms, LTD., D/B/A Crooked Creek Shooting PreserveSupreme Court of Iowa · 2012
  3. State Ex Rel. Parcel v. St. JohnSupreme Court of Iowa · 1981
  4. Krugman v. Palmer College of ChiropracticSupreme Court of Iowa · 1988
  5. Postma v. Sioux Center NewsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1986

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API