Legal Opinion

Postma v. Sioux Center News

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided September 17, 1986No. 85-197PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HARRIS, Justice.

A libel suit brought by plaintiff Harold 0. Postma and members of his family was dismissed as a sanction for Postma’s failure to appear for his deposition. Upon plaintiffs’ appeal we affirm in part, reverse in part and remand.

Harold 0. Postma (Postma) was serving as Sioux County attorney in 1982 when defendant newspapers printed articles quoting “six unnamed attorneys” and one “unnamed legal official” from the area (also defendants in this action) who claimed Postma was “often late to hearings or trials” and kept his office understaffed as a “political ploy” in order to appear…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Haumersen v. Ford Motor Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1977
  2. Hubby v. StateSupreme Court of Iowa · 1983
  3. McCarney v. Des Moines Register & Tribune Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1976
  4. Eickelberg v. Deere & Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1979
  5. Shill v. Careage Corp.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1984

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Kendall/Hunt Publishing Co. v. RoweSupreme Court of Iowa · 1988
  2. Committee on Professional Ethics & Conduct of the Iowa State Bar Ass'n v. PostmaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1988
  3. Troendle v. HansonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1997
  4. Krugman v. Palmer College of ChiropracticSupreme Court of Iowa · 1988
  5. Bindel v. LarringtonCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 1995

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API