Wm. R. Moore Dry Goods Co. v. Rowe & Carithers
Mississippi Supreme Court
Appeal from the circuit court of Tallahatchie county. Sam C. Cook, Judge. The opinion in this case is rendered on a suggestion of error. The case on original hearing being reported in 53 South. 626'.
1DissentSmith, J.
I am of the opinion that this suggestion of error ought to be sustained. My views relative to this matter will be found outlined in the following decisions: Williams v. Bank, 15 Okl. 477, 82 Pac. 496, 2 L. R. A. (N. S.) 337; Thrope v. Pennock Mercantile Co., 99 Minn. 26, 108 N. W. 940; Gilbert v. Gonyea, 113 Minn. 459, 115 N. W. 640 ; Sprintz v. Saxon, 126 App. Div. 421, 110 N. Y. Supp. 586; Fisher v. Hermann, 118 Wis. 428, 95 N. W. 392; Baumeister v. Fink, 141 Ill. App. 372.
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Thorpe v. Pennock Mercantile Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
- Fisher v. HerrmannWisconsin Supreme Court · 1903
- Williams v. Fourth National BankSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1905
- Duluth Terminal Railway Co. v. City of DuluthSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1911
- Sprintz v. SaxtonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1908
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.