Legal Opinion

Williams v. Fourth National Bank

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided September 5, 1905PublishedCited by 18 opinions

Error from the District Court of Comanche County; before Frank E. Gillette, Trial Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the court by

Pancoast, J.:

The defendant in error sued J. T. Williams upon a judgment theretofore recovered against him in the Indian Territory. An attachment was sued out. upon an affidavit alleging a conveyance by the debtor of his prop? ertv with intent to cheat, hinder and delay his creditors, and levied upon a stock of drugs. R. C. Williams appeared as interpleader, and claimed tbe property levied upon, by virtue of a sale to him in bulk from the judgment debtor, his brother. This the bank in its answer denied, attacking the sale to the interpleader as fraudulent and void, by…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. John P. Squire & Co. v. TellierMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1904
  2. McDaniels v. J. J. Connelly Shoe Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1902
  3. Walp v. MooarSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1904
  4. Bates v. PricketIndiana Supreme Court · 1854
  5. People ex rel. Dean v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Colorado · 1882

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Jaques & Tinsley Co. v. Carstarphen Warehouse Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1908
  2. Charges J. Off & Co. v. MoreheadIllinois Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Klein v. . MaravelasNew York Court of Appeals · 1916
  4. Wheeler & Motter Merc. Co. v. MoonMontana Supreme Court · 1914
  5. Thorpe v. Pennock Mercantile Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1906

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API