Legal Opinion

Kubik v. Streule

Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division

Decided October 20, 1997PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGreco, J.

This is an action in tort to recover for personal injuries allegedly sustained by the plaintiff in an accident involving the plaintiffs and the defendant’s motor vehicles. The trial court dismissed the action pursuant to Mass. R. Civ. R, Rule 40) for the plaintiffs failure to serve a summons and copy of the complaint upon the defendant within ninety days of complaint filing. The plaintiff has appealed that ruling pursuant to Dist./Mun. Cts. R.AD A., Rule 8C.1

1. On October 18,1995, one day prior to the expiration of the statute of limitations, the plaintiff commenced this action in the Salem…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Davis v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1920
  2. Hull v. Attleboro Savings BankMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1992
  3. Shuman v. Stanley WorksMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1991
  4. Scalia v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1995
  5. Mazzoleni v. CottonMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1992

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Plavin v. LuttsMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2000
  2. Maniscola v. KenworthyMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2002
  3. Maloney v. MaloneyMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2004
  4. Cambridge Housing Authority v. BurneyMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1998
  5. Hinton v. LipisMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API