Legal Opinion
Hull v. Attleboro Savings Bank
Massachusetts Appeals Court
Decided July 22, 1992No. 91-P-567PublishedCited by 77 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWarner, C.J.
This is the consolidation of separate appeals and cross-appeals arising from two actions filed by the plaintiff against the same parties. Both actions stem from the 1982 foreclosure of a mortgage on a former residence owned by the plaintiff in Attleboro. We recite first the long procedural history of the cases.
The mortgagee, Attleboro Savings Bank (bank), commenced foreclosure proceedings after the plaintiff had failed to make mortgage payments for approximately two years. The bank conducted its foreclosure proceedings under two independent methods concurrently. First, the bank proceeded to…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Peterson v. HopsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
- Winters v. Teledyne Movible Offshore, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1985
- Andrea Geiger v. Donald AllenCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1988
- Shuman v. Stanley WorksMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1991
- Travenol Laboratories, Inc. v. Zotal, Ltd.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1985
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by77 opinions
- Kuwaiti Danish Computer Co. v. Digital Equipment Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2003
- Salois v. Dime Savings BankCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1997
- Commissioner of Revenue v. CarriganMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1998
- Collins v. HuculakMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2003
- Zucco v. KaneMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2003
72 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.