Legal Opinion

Jain v. Giffin

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided January 15, 1893PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from the District Court of Boulder County.

1Opinion of the CourtBissell, J.

Early in 1886, W. S. Case and Miles Jain jointly executed to the order of S. B. Austin a promissory note for $650, pay*91able at a date named and bearing a fixed rate of interest. It would appear from the record that Case was the borrower, and Giffin, the appellee, was the loaner of the money, Austin acting as the broker to procure it, and to accomplish the negotiation of the paper. Giffin declined to loan the money except upon the guaranty of Jain’s name, who was supposed to be financially good. Some chattel security seems to have been given, but with this we have no concern. After the paper…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Parkhurst v. VailIllinois Supreme Court · 1874

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Cownie v. DoddSupreme Court of Iowa · 1914
  2. Linger v. ROCKY MOUNTAIN BANK AND TRUST COMPANYColorado Court of Appeals · 1971
  3. Prather v. Roto Ignition Sales, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1970
  4. Prather v. Roto Ignition Sales, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API