Legal Opinion

Prather v. Roto Ignition Sales, Inc.

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided April 20, 1970No. 22905PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Pringle

■This writ of error arises out of an action based on an exclusive sales agreement. M. V. Lingenfelter, a defendant in the trial court and hereinafter referred to as such or by name, invented a certain kind of automobile engine timer and distributor. He entered into an agreement with Edward Prather, another defendant, concerning the exclusive right to manufacture and sell this timer. Prather then entered into an exclusive sales agreement with Roto Ignition Sales, Inc., the plaintiff in the court below and hereinafter referred to as the plaintiff. Under the terms of the latter agreement,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Gholson v. SavinOhio Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Jain v. GiffinColorado Court of Appeals · 1893

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. First Commercial Corporation v. GeterColorado Court of Appeals · 1976
  2. Linger v. ROCKY MOUNTAIN BANK AND TRUST COMPANYColorado Court of Appeals · 1971
  3. Prather v. Roto Ignition Sales, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API