Legal Opinion

Parkhurst v. Vail

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided September 15, 1874PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook county; the Hon. Henby Booth, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Breese

This was assumpsit, in the Cook circuit court, on a promissory note, executed on the 18tli of July, 1857, by Henry A. Parkhurst and Robert L. Wilson, and payable to one Micah Vail, since deceased, six months after date, for the sum of seven hundred dollars. The action is by his administrator.

The declaration alleges that, on the same day of the date of the note, the defendant, Sanford B. Parkhurst, in consideration that said Micah Vail would receive said note so executed, he, by his indorsement in writing on said note by him signed, guaranteed the payment of the money specified in the note,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Webster v. CobbIllinois Supreme Court · 1856

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Stowell v. RaymondIllinois Supreme Court · 1876
  2. Ewen v. WilborAppellate Court of Illinois · 1901
  3. Kankakee Coal Co. v. Crane Bros. Manufacturing Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Pfaelzer v. KauIllinois Supreme Court · 1904
  5. First Nat. Bank v. HawkinsOregon Supreme Court · 1914

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API