Louis v. Elfelt
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the city and county of San Francisco, and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Vanclief, C.
— This action was brought to recover from the defendants five hundred dollars, alleged to be due the plaintiff as salary for his services as salesman for Elfelt & Co. during the month of December, 1886.
The answer of defendants denies that plaintiff was employed by Elfelt & Co., or by the defendants, for any part of the month of December, 1886, and denies that he rendered any services to Elfelt & Co., or to defendants, during that month.
The plaintiff had judgment for the sum demanded, from which, and from an order denying their motion for a new trial, defendants appeal.
The material…
2Cited by5 opinions
- Charles B. Webster Real Estate v. RickardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
- Yahr-Donen Corp. v. CrockerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
- Pacific Bank v. HannahCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1898
- Williams v. Schalk Chemical Co.California Court of Appeal · 1936
- Shumate v. SohonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1926