Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Yahr-Donen Corp. v. Crocker

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 1, 1947No. Civ. 15755PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMoore, P. J.

Prior to February 15, 1945, Maude E. Crocker and Grace E. Buchner as a partnership had engaged in retail merchandising at Pomona under the firm name of “Petite Shop.’’ On that day they entered into a contract with respondent whereby the latter was to act as resident New York buyer for the partnership, and in connection therewith agreed to render services in and about (1) the buying of merchandise, (2) special orders, (3) market information, (4) best sources, (5) best proven reorder style numbers, (6) daily and weekly bulletins, (7) follow up on orders, (8) advantages of group purchases, and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Cotten v. Perishable Air ConditionersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Husheon v. KelleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Louis v. ElfeltCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Burkle v. Superflow Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1951
  2. Estate of Skaggs v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1980
  3. Freese v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
  4. Estate of PeeblesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
  5. Lenkin v. BeckmanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API