Legal Opinion
Womack v. Boston Fisheries
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided October 29, 1974No. 45925PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DOOLIN, Justice.
This is a proceeding to review an en banc order, affirming a trial judge’s order, requiring petitioner to pay medical and hospital bills incurred by an injured employee (Womack). Undue time lapse between injury, treatment, filing of claims, hearings, and eventual entry (July 15, 1971) of the order reviewed, necessitate extended summation to disclose chronological sequence of events creating this controversy.
Claim for compensation filed March 12, 1972, alleged occurrence of accidental back injury January 10, 1962. A trial judge’s award of compensation was modified by State…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Wilson v. WilsonUtah Supreme Court · 1956
- Aetna Life Ins. Co. v. WattsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
- Higley v. SchlessmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1956
- Depue v. Barsh Truck LinesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1972
- Standard Paving Co. v. LemmonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Iwunoh v. Maremont Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1984
- Fortenbacher v. Guardsmark, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1993
- Iwunoh v. Maremont Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1984
- Iwunoh v. Maremont Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1984
- Thompson v. J.W. Buck ConstructionCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2001